
PayrHealth · Updated November 2026
The main types of healthcare provider contracts with payors are fee-for-service (usually a negotiated fee schedule), capitation, case rates and per diems, bundled or episode payments, and value-based arrangements such as shared savings. Single case agreements cover one patient when no in-network option exists. Most payor contracts combine more than one, and each shifts risk differently between you and the payor.
Health care contracts come in many forms, and the payment method shapes your revenue as much as the rate does. This guide explains each type, its pros and cons, and what to check before you sign.
The insurance contracts a practice signs usually come in three layers:
For what goes into each layer, see what provider contracting is.
The payor pays you for each service at the rate in your fee schedule. The rate may be expressed as a percentage of Medicare, the payor's own fee schedule, or flat amounts per code.
Fee-for-service is the base of most payor contracts. In plans' published rate files, more than 99.9% of the commercial rate lines for an established-patient office visit (CPT 99214) are fee-for-service, and capitation and bundled lines together are under 0.1%, in PayrHealth's analysis. The files list a rate for each code, so they lean toward fee-for-service by design, and value-based payments, which usually sit on top of a fee-for-service base, don't appear in them.
Pros: you are paid for the work you do; revenue grows with volume and new services; rates are easy to check against the contract.
Cons: revenue rises and falls with volume; payors pair fee-for-service with cost controls such as prior authorization and utilization review; the fee schedule can stay flat for years without an escalator.
The payor pays a fixed amount per member per month (PMPM) for each patient assigned to you, whether or not they use services. For example, $50 PMPM for 100 assigned members is $5,000 a month, whether you see 30 of them or 90.
Pros: predictable revenue; rewards prevention and efficient care.
Cons: you carry the risk if patients need more care than the payment covers; it takes good data on your patient population to price well; under-service is a risk the payor will monitor.
Common in hospital and facility contracts. A case rate pays a set amount per admission or procedure, often grouped by diagnosis-related group (DRG); a per diem pays a set amount per day. Watch the outlier terms for unusually long or costly cases, and which services are carved out.
One payment covers all services in a defined episode, such as a joint replacement and its follow-up care, often split among several providers. Bundles reward coordination and penalize avoidable complications; they need clear episode definitions and a way to share the payment.
Value-based contracts tie part of your payment to cost and quality:
Check attribution rules, quality measures, targets, and any cap on losses.
A single case agreement (SCA) sets a rate for one patient's care when you are out of network and the payor has no in-network provider who can deliver it. It is not a substitute for a contract. A pattern of SCAs with one payor is evidence of a gap in its network, which can support a request to join. See what to do when a payor says the network is closed.
Contracts in healthcare also include employment and professional services agreements with physicians, agreements between hospitals and physician groups, and vendor contracts. These follow different rules; this guide covers contracts with payors.
Fee-for-service, capitation, case rates and per diems, bundled payments, value-based arrangements, and single case agreements.
Fee-for-service through a negotiated fee schedule is the base of most payor contracts; value-based terms usually sit on top of it.
Fee-for-service pays for each service; capitation pays a fixed amount per member per month regardless of how many services are used.
Yes, but for one patient only. It doesn't make you in network for anyone else.
PayrHealth negotiates payor contracts of every type, from fee schedules to facility case rates. A free rate review benchmarks each of your payor contracts, using payor price transparency data, against the best-paid quarter of practices like yours, for the same codes, in your market. You see which contracts could pay more, and which gaps reflect leverage a negotiation may not close. It's free, with no obligation, and practices that qualify pick a time with our team right after they submit. See if you qualify for a free rate review.
PayrHealth analysis of payors' published in-network rate files under the federal Transparency in Coverage rule, latest files available in October 2026: every commercial rate line for CPT 99214, professional, grouped by the payment arrangement each plan reports (fee-for-service, capitation or bundle). About 68 million lines; 99.94% fee-for-service, 0.05% capitation, under 0.01% bundled. Line counts weight plans that publish the same rate across many networks more heavily.